Nadia Fairbairn
Research Interests
Relevant Thesis-Based Degree Programs
Recruitment
Complete these steps before you reach out to a faculty member!
- Familiarize yourself with program requirements. You want to learn as much as possible from the information available to you before you reach out to a faculty member. Be sure to visit the graduate degree program listing and program-specific websites.
- Check whether the program requires you to seek commitment from a supervisor prior to submitting an application. For some programs this is an essential step while others match successful applicants with faculty members within the first year of study. This is either indicated in the program profile under "Admission Information & Requirements" - "Prepare Application" - "Supervision" or on the program website.
- Identify specific faculty members who are conducting research in your specific area of interest.
- Establish that your research interests align with the faculty member’s research interests.
- Read up on the faculty members in the program and the research being conducted in the department.
- Familiarize yourself with their work, read their recent publications and past theses/dissertations that they supervised. Be certain that their research is indeed what you are hoping to study.
- Compose an error-free and grammatically correct email addressed to your specifically targeted faculty member, and remember to use their correct titles.
- Do not send non-specific, mass emails to everyone in the department hoping for a match.
- Address the faculty members by name. Your contact should be genuine rather than generic.
- Include a brief outline of your academic background, why you are interested in working with the faculty member, and what experience you could bring to the department. The supervision enquiry form guides you with targeted questions. Ensure to craft compelling answers to these questions.
- Highlight your achievements and why you are a top student. Faculty members receive dozens of requests from prospective students and you may have less than 30 seconds to pique someone’s interest.
- Demonstrate that you are familiar with their research:
- Convey the specific ways you are a good fit for the program.
- Convey the specific ways the program/lab/faculty member is a good fit for the research you are interested in/already conducting.
- Be enthusiastic, but don’t overdo it.
G+PS regularly provides virtual sessions that focus on admission requirements and procedures and tips how to improve your application.
ADVICE AND INSIGHTS FROM UBC FACULTY ON REACHING OUT TO SUPERVISORS
These videos contain some general advice from faculty across UBC on finding and reaching out to a potential thesis supervisor.
Supervision Enquiry
Graduate Student Supervision
Master's Student Supervision
Theses completed in 2010 or later are listed below. Please note that there is a 6-12 month delay to add the latest theses.
Background: North America is facing an opioid epidemic primarily attributable to potent synthetic opioids. There has been a marked increase in methamphetamine/amphetamine use and related harms among people who use opioids. However, little is known about this population and their treatment-related outcomes. The aim of this thesis was to characterize the population of people with prescription-type opioid use disorder (POUD) who use methamphetamine/amphetamine, and to determine the effects of methamphetamine/amphetamine use and opioid agonist therapy (OAT) on treatment-related outcomes. Methods: Secondary analysis of a pan-Canadian pragmatic trial comparing supervised methadone versus flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone models of care among POUD. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine correlates of baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use (measured by urine drug test [UDT] and self-report). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the impact of baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use on OAT discontinuation. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone on methamphetamine/amphetamine use. Results: Among the 272 randomized participants, 185 (68.0%) were using methamphetamine/amphetamine at baseline. Fentanyl use in the last 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 11.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.90 – 23.68] was independently and positively associated with baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use. Among participants that initiated treatment (n = 210), 130 (61.9%) were using methamphetamine/amphetamine at baseline. Baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use was associated with shorter median times in assigned OAT (36 versus 168 days, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.07, CI = 1.22 – 3.49) and any OAT (41 days versus 168 days, aHR = 1.83, CI = 1.05 – 3.17). Neither treatment type nor time in treatment were significantly associated with the odds of methamphetamine/amphetamine use (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In this sample of people with POUD, methamphetamine/amphetamine use was associated with markers of complex and severe OUD, including fentanyl exposure, and increased risk of OAT discontinuation. Methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone did not have an impact on methamphetamine/amphetamine use over the 24-week intervention. These findings suggest the need for targeted interventions, including development of evidence-based treatments for methamphetamine/amphetamine use within specific subgroups, to prevent future overdoses and optimize treatment outcomes in this population.
View record
If this is your researcher profile you can log in to the Faculty & Staff portal to update your details and provide recruitment preferences.
